Why Georgia’s 12th CD Should be on Everyone’s Mind
From Wikipedia:
“As chairman of the party, Dean created and employed the ’50 State Strategy’ that attempted to make Democrats competitive in normally conservative states often dismissed in the past as ‘solid red.’ The success of the strategy became apparent after the 2006 midterm elections, where Democrats took back the House and picked up seats in the Senate from normally Republican states such as Missouri and Montana. In the 2008 election, Barack Obama used ‘The 50 state strategy’ as the backbone of his candidacy.”
As the November 2010 mid-term elections rapidly approaches it is now even more important to focus on every race, every state, and every primary. Blogger Melissa Clouthier describes the problem in the Republican party:
“The Republicans conceding in between elections as well as races, themselves, has been a tremendous source of irritation. It is one thing to microtarget and write off a district because it’s ‘unwinnable’. The problem is that too many areas were written off that could, in this election, be won. And now, with no foundation there, it makes the task of winning more difficult. Texas isn’t the only place this has happened. In fact, this is a problem nationwide for Republicans. With a lack of organization and get out the vote effort and the lack of relationship building, many potentially winnable races will be lost simply because there is no there, there. It’s been conceded.”
Clouthier’s article includes a review of a primary race in a solidly red state of Georgia. In Georgia’s 12th Congressional district candidate Ray McKinney is running a tight primary race against former fire chief Carl Smith, Jr. McKinney, a former supporter of Smith, has run a solid campaign while Smith has been embroiled in a number of ethical situations reminiscent of Democrat candidates. This is where the problem lies, as the Tea Party activists have become more politically savvy, every candidate must be held to a higher standard. To ensure a government that is free of corruption, the people must be willing to expose those within their own party whose actions are not aligned with our values.
According to the Savannah Business Journal:
“On June 9, Thunderbolt Town Council terminated Smith’s $52,000 a year position as Thunderbolt’s Fire Chief. The reasons behind the termination have publicly varied – officially it’s financial reasons, unofficially Smith took too much time off to campaign, and to Smith it’s all politically motivated…”
According to local reports, Smith was advised by former congressional candidate Wayne Mosley, members of the 12th District executive board, and Ray McKinney, that to avoid appearance of conflict of interest, he should resign as Fire Chief to run for Congress. Obviously Smith declined that advice and now there are allegations by concerned citizens in the district that not only was Smith an absentee fire chief but that he may have violated the Hatch Act.
Part of the 50 page watchdog report states:
” The Hatch Act of 1939 was introduced to prevent corruption in government and elections. Its main provision prevents federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity. However, it also applies to employees of state and local governments…..
Currently in Georgia’s 12th congressional district, a public official who has applied for and received federal funds in his capacity as chief of the Thunderbolt Fire Department is in violation of the Hatch Act.”
The report alleges that Smith, in his role as Fire Chief, used his office, uniform, and vehicle to campaign for public office in violation of the Hatch Act. Evidence included screen shots of Smith’s website which show him in various official uniforms on his campaign website and in fund raising letters like the ones below.
The report also includes information on the Federal funds that Smith had either applied or lobbied for in his capacity as Thunderbolt Fire Chief.
As the report points out, politicians in others states have been found in violation of the Hatch act for amounts less than shown above and in one instance, the state of Utah must either forfeit federal funds or force a state senator to resign.
Ray McKinney’s camp is taking this primary seriously and according to the Savannah Business Journal, has raised $100,000 already. McKinney, who I met at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in April, and again in DC over dinner, has been endorsed by local Tea Party groups and One Nation PAC, has been praised by the NRA and has a plan to clean up the Gulf oil spill.
Character counts in selecting elected officials and Republicans must be willing to recognize the early signs of susceptibility to corruption within our ranks. When representatives go across the aisle on votes like Cap and Trade or Wall Street reform, voters are left wondering what happened. That’s why every race counts. ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, operated under the idea that “all politics is local.” As seen in other districts like California’s 37th Congressional district where Star Parker is running to unseat Representative Laura Richardson, a corrupt local politician can became a national problem with the outcome of one election.
If Republicans introduce their own problem candidate into the November 2010 election, they run the risk of handing that district over to a Democrat who will capitalize on Smith’s current troubles.
Smith’s ethical issues only highlight McKinney as the viable candidate and a costly run-off will distract from the main goal for putting the Democrat candidate on the defensive. If Republicans unite in GA-12, McKinney is the best choice for a sustainable conservative majority. To donate or find out more information about McKinney, go here. Every race, every state.












Here’s the basic problem with your position: the GOP has no problem with a Democrat winning in heartland states like Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, or other states with traditionally red districts. You know why? Because if those Democrats switched party affiliations and went Republican, they’d have won the district as well.
Take healthcare reform, which everyone decried as a socialist command takeover of healthcare. There’s only one issue with that depiction: many of the recommendations, from the mandate on down, had their origin in GOP think tanks like Heritage or governorships like that of Romney in Massachusetts. The GOP had no problem with a mandate to buy healthcare, or the fact that the healthcare will inevitably rely upon cuts to Medicare and Medicaid to fund government subsidies for private insurance policies which will enrich the private health insurance industry by hundreds of billions of dollars through the coercion of their new customers by the federal government.
The problem isn’t the Democratic Party’s 50 state strategy. It’s the fact that there is no real difference between Republicans and Democrats. I guarantee you that the comprehensive repeal of the healthcare reform legislation will not occur if the Republicans conquer the House and flip the Senate. Even if the GOP takes more seats in future election cycles, it won’t happen.
Your other problem is this: in 2012, either Mitt Romney or Jeb Bush will win the 2012 GOP nomination. By that time, Barack Obama will either be irrelevant as a Democratic nominee due to the economy, or he will have already resigned because of the economy. Mitt has a record that speaks for itself on healthcare and government overreach, and Jeb is a Bush.
While you contribute to the general din which insists that the GOP and the Democrats are mutually exclusive, those of us with a brain can see quite clearly that they are not. You could give either of those parties a 50 state plan and arrive at the same result: more federal power and state overreach.
And let’s review the real substantive differences between Democrats and Republicans, shall we? It was a Republican solicitor general who mounted the challenge to DOMA out in California; the same attorney, in fact, who represented Bush in 2000. The Obama Administration used the same language as the Bush Administration’s Justice Department in its Justice Department amicus brief to denigrate gay marriage and gay relationships in general, comparing them to bestiality and pedophilia. In general, what you’re seeing is the Hegelian dialectic played out to perfection here: while people get to think that gay marriage is still opposed by the President and most Republicans, it’s going to happen in the courts. Period.
And that abortion prohibition by executive order vis a vis the Stupak compromise? Well, now the Obama Administration is extending language prohibiting abortion coverage by private insurance for people with pre-existing conditions, language which goes beyond the Hyde Amendment and the Stupak compromise executive order. All to have the appearance of some level of federal opposition to abortion, while abortion on demand remains the reality for any woman who can afford to pay for it separately from insurance. You get to placate idiot fundamentalists who can’t see the forest for the trees, while simultaneously preserving a culture of abortion which results in the termination of millions of lives.
And all of this, for the grand illusion of two parties who supposedly hate each other but actually work quite well in concert when it comes to the matters that really matter: spending and the various items which require both parties to look the other way. An oversight, if you will, which negates real oversight.
It’s nice that you’re playing along with it, Anita. But given your less than distinguished provenance, I have a real issue with the idea that you’re one of us. By us, I mean those of us who really have a problem with statist overreach and intrusion into every area of our lives, from warrantless wiretaps, email trolling, indefinite detentions, extraordinary renditions, mandates to purchase private products and services, and the like. I wouldn’t go so far as to accuse you of anything improper, because I have no direct proof of the state of your mind when you write these pieces, but the reality is this: there is no real or substantive difference between Republicans and Democrats on any of the aforementioned five issues, plus the sixth issue of overspending, because on all six of those issues, they’ve colluded successfully to implement those issues and give them the patina of legal legitimacy. And so we’re at a real conundrum in this society, because we could arguably elect a lot of Republicans in November and get the same result we’d get with Democrats.
Perhaps we need our own 50 state plan.